| Title | Analysis of progression with Peridata TM and guided progression analysis (GPA) in glaucoma patients |
| Purpose | To compare the rate of progression of GPA with the progression analysis calculated by Peridata in a mixed glaucoma group. |
| Methods | Retrospective, observational study including 25 patients (46 eyes) of know glaucoma patients who underwent filtering surgery or laser trabeculoplasty during the follow-up period were excluded. Mean age was 70 +/- 18 yrs. Each patient performed a mean number of 13 +/- 4,6 (range: 9 to 28) standard automated perimetry visual test (Sita Standard 24-2) per eye and with a mean follow-up of 7,5 +/- 1,3 yrs. |
| Results | The mean of progression by Peridata (dB/year) and GPA (%/year) were: -0,2 +/- 0,38 and -0,55 +/- 0,71 respectively. This difference in progression was not signifiantly different (p value= 0,06). There was an excellent correlation between Peridata progression analysis and GPA (< 0,001) |
| Conclusion | Rate of progression with GPA and progression analysis of Peridata are two trend analysis. This could explain the excellent correlation. They represent complementary information and methods for progression of visual field. To date, our results didn't show significant difference between GPA and Peridata. |
| Last name | FORTUNATI |
| Initials | M |
| Department | Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc- UCL |
| City | brussels |
| Last name | Morel-Detry |
| Initials | M |
| Department | Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc- UCL |
| City | brussels |
| Last name | Pourjavan |
| Initials | S |
| Department | Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc |
| City | Brussels |