View abstract

This abstract is assigned to sessions

Presentation type	E-poster
Title	The belgian endothelial surgical transplant of the cornea (best cornea):

Purpose	Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of Ultra-Thin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A multicentric, randomised, parallel group pragmatic trial in corneal endothelial decompensation. The objective of this study is to compare two surgical techniques for lamellar endothelial keratoplasty, UT-DSAEK and DMEK, for the treatment of corneal endothelium disease, mainly Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and bullous keratopathy. This study will use wide inclusion criteria, over a large surgical consortium. The goal is to determine which is the most appropriate surgical approach for corneal disease, which is the third leading cause of blindness globally.
Methods	This study is conducted as a pragmatic, parallel, multicentric, randomized controlled trial involving 220 participants from 11 surgical centers. The participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either UT-DSAEK or DMEK. The two types of cornea grafts are prepared using standardised techniques, respectively in two subspecialized corneal banks. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed. Coded data will be recorded in the study software databank (REDCap).
Results	The primary outcome is the change in BCVA at 12 months. The secondary outcomes include the corrected and uncorrected vision, refraction, proportion of high vision, quality of life, endothelial cell counts and corneal thickness at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up appointments. Complications will also be compared 12-months postoperatively.
Conclusion	Study with broad inclusion criteria across multiple surgical centers in order to determine the optimal surgical approach. Additional benefits are centralizing graft preparation, enhancing operating room efficiency, potentially lowering graft rejection rates, contribution to the training of the appropriate technique and enhancing quality and safety of corneal surgery.
Conflict of interest	No

Authors 1

Last name	DE BRUYN
Initials	B
Department	Dept. of Ophthalmology, UZ Antwerp

Authors 2

Last name	NI DHUBHGHAILL
Initials	S
Department	Dept. of Ophthalmology, UZ Antwerp & UZ Brussels

Authors 3

Last name	DUCHESNE
Initials	B
Department	Dept. of Ophthalmology, CHU Liège

Authors 4

Last name	KOPPEN
Initials	C
Department	Dept. of Ophthalmology, UZ Antwerp